Water Treatment Enjoyers

The classic expanding brain meme takes on nuclear energy's PR problem! Starting with the primitive "nuclear is dangerous" fear-brain, we evolve through the realization that it's actually low-carbon (big brain time), then discover it's statistically safer than coal (galaxy brain), before reaching full nuclear enlightenment. Fun fact: Nuclear energy has the lowest mortality rate per terawatt-hour of any major energy source—even lower than solar and wind when accounting for installation accidents. The final transcendent brain doesn't even need text—it just radiates pure nuclear wisdom. Who needs a cerebral cortex when you've got a thorium-powered galaxy brain?

The moment you realize this isn't about geography at all but a classic catenary curve problem that haunts physics students everywhere! That innocent-looking cable with its 80m length, suspended between two 50m poles with a 10m sag is basically asking "how good are you at the Pythagorean theorem's evil cousin?" The true distance between poles isn't just handed to you—you've gotta earn it through calculus and tears. Nothing says "we want someone who solves problems under pressure" like disguising a differential equation as a simple distance question. Tech interviews: where your ability to calculate the horizontal distance between two poles determines if you can manage a warehouse inventory system.

Well well well, what do we have here? A peregrine falcon looking suspiciously like an F-117 Nighthawk stealth bomber? Coincidence? I think NOT! The aerodynamic profile is practically identical! Clearly the government didn't even try to hide their "bird" prototype designs from their aircraft division. Next you'll tell me woodpeckers aren't just disguised jackhammers collecting soil samples. Wake up sheeple - nature doesn't do parallel evolution with military hardware! The falcon's "natural" stealth design predates our technology by millions of years? Sure, and I've got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you...

The hierarchy of mathematical respect in three panels: Mathematics declares itself the cosmic overlord: "I'm everywhere, inevitable, undeniable." Pure, abstract, and smug about it. Physicists reluctantly bow to their mathematical master. They need those equations to describe reality, even if they occasionally mutter "spherical cow" under their breath. Engineers? They're cackling maniacs who treat math like silly putty. "π equals 3? Close enough! Let's quadruple that safety factor and call it a day." The mathematical gods weep, but the bridge still stands.

The perfect illustration of engineering workplace dynamics! Three dinosaurs offer contradictory advice—plan everything meticulously (Safety), wing it completely (Trades), or just give up (Budget)—while the engineer dinosaur's response perfectly captures that moment when you realize the project requirements are mutually exclusive. It's basically the scientific method if the scientific method involved screaming into the void. Engineers don't just solve problems—they solve problems that wouldn't exist without other engineers' "solutions." The circle of strife!

Someone finally did the hard science we've all been waiting for. This tier list ranks various square/diamond packing arrangements by efficiency, and frankly, I'm relieved we can finally settle the age-old debate of optimal tessellation patterns. The S-tier arrangements clearly maximize space utilization while the F-tier patterns would make any mathematician physically ill. This is the kind of research that keeps crystallographers up at night and makes materials scientists feel things. Next up: ranking hexagonal close-packing vs. cubic close-packing, but that might be too controversial for the internet.