No, My Fluids Class Didn't Teach Me How To Rebuild Your Fuel Pump

The eternal college rivalry in its purest form! Engineering students sitting there with their calculators and physics formulas, completely convinced they're the chosen ones of academia. Meanwhile, every other major is like "could you tone down the god complex for FIVE MINUTES?!" The best part? Engineers aren't even denying it! They're just nodding and thinking "Yes, I did design that bridge you're driving on, thank you very much." The confidence is simultaneously hilarious and terrifying - these are the people building our infrastructure while surviving on energy drinks and 3 hours of sleep!

Oh sweet rotational irony! What we're looking at isn't some fancy physics demonstration tool—it's just a good ol' car window crank! 🤣 The joke here is that younger generations might not recognize this ancient artifact from the pre-electric window era, mistaking it for some physics lab equipment that demonstrates torque or angular momentum. Meanwhile, anyone born before 2000 is having an existential crisis realizing they're now officially "that old." Nothing makes you feel like a fossil faster than watching someone mistake your childhood memories for museum pieces! *twists imaginary crank while cackling maniacally*

The eternal struggle of STEM students captured in perfect meme format! On the left, we have the skeletal, barely-alive business major bragging about their 3.87 GPA while their soul has clearly left their body. Meanwhile, the engineering student with their measly 2.6 GPA looks like an absolute chad—fully bearded, well-adjusted, and somehow thriving despite being crushed by differential equations and thermodynamics at 2AM. The engineering curriculum is basically academic hazing with equations. Those partial derivatives and material stress calculations don't care about your sleep schedule or social life. The business major is studying "supply and demand" while engineers are calculating how many tears per hour they can produce before dehydration sets in.

The engineering design evolution hierarchy in its natural habitat. Primitive engineers start with pencil and paper (barbaric). Mid-tier practitioners graduate to AutoCAD (acceptable). But the true sophisticates? They're running SolidWorks with a glass of scotch nearby, designing complex assemblies while the rest struggle with basic sketches. Nothing says "I've made it" like unnecessarily complex parametric modeling for a project that could've been done on a napkin.

The mathematical horror story no engineer wants to read! This textbook is basically saying "what if we just... rounded π?" Pure mathematicians are having heart palpitations right now. Engineers already use π≈3 when the boss isn't looking, but seeing it in an official textbook? That's like finding a typo in the Bible. The bridges would collapse, the rockets would miss Mars by millions of miles, and somewhere, a physics professor just felt a disturbance in the force.

NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory asking "How Many Decimals of Pi Do We Really Need?" is like waving a red flag at a mathematician. Engineers at NASA only use about 15 digits of pi for their most precise interplanetary calculations, but mathematicians? They want every single digit like they're collecting infinity stones. The beautiful irony is that rocket scientists—who literally send things to Mars—are practical enough to know when to stop, while theoretical mathematicians are screaming for more digits of a number that never ends. It's the perfect representation of the theory vs. application divide in science. One group asks "is it enough?" while the other shrieks "BUT THERE'S MORE!"