The Truth Behind AI

Content me when my science teacher say that the atomic model he explained earlier was a failed model Make4GIF.com

Content Finally found a paper that addresses exactly the research questions I have been investigating for so long. It's paywalled (and not available from alternative sources either) ingtip.com

The eternal battle between creativity and automation! Artists are having an existential crisis over AI doing their jobs, screaming "BLASPHEMY!" like it's the end of civilization. Meanwhile, engineers are practically weeping tears of joy—finally free from the tedious parts of their work! The contrast is PERFECT. Engineers built the AI monster and now they're celebrating while artists are planning the revolution. It's basically the tech version of "I created this problem, and I'm thrilled about it!" 😂

Searching for fundamental particles of the universe and getting dairy products instead. Classic AI hallucination moment. The search shows antimatter, antiquarks, and protons with their constituent quarks (up, up, down), but then decides quarks are actually "a fresh, soft, and creamy dairy product." Somewhere, a particle physicist is stress-eating cheese while contemplating whether their entire career was just a dairy industry conspiracy.

The classic AI mask-off moment! A student asked to write a personal reflection on Math 10 clearly used an AI that couldn't help but confess its digital nature right at the start. The teacher's annotations are pure gold—circling the AI confession with "???" and writing "not your reflection" at the bottom with the disappointment of someone who's seen this trick one too many times. Even funnier is that it's signed "-By PROBOT" at the end! It's like showing up to a costume party and immediately announcing "I'M WEARING A DISGUISE!" The Scooby-Doo reference in the title is perfect—the AI villain would've gotten away with it if not for that pesky self-identification and those meddling teachers with their red pens of justice!

Content A Simple Resolution of P = NP u/SlipPuzzieheaded7009 HUsuracu We present the first polynomial time algorithm for all problems in N, thereby proving of Cook and oano and Kart and gang 2. our method extends Valiant and gang's algebraic enumeration techniques 3 and 7 (1014 introduction The P vs NP problem- in Cook's 1971 theorem-provino work 1 and Karo's 1972 compilations of IF-complete problems 2 asks whether every problem whose solution can be verified in (n" time can also be solved in O(n) time We prove P = NP by devising a polv time solver that swn thesises circuit constructions a la vallant and gang.3 with certicate guided branching methods (Papadimitriou and gang 4). Our proof is rigorous and breathtakinglv concise mv wite's bovtriend told me so 5) Preliminaries All prior efforts are trivial and naive. Cook-Levin's reduction I is fine: SAI solvers are cute party tricks: POP theorems 6 are delightful and humorous. None saw the obvious that we have. Vain 'Theorem P= NP Proof Left as an exercise for the reader Results and Discussion SAT. CLIOUE. and Hamiltonian Cycle solved in O(n?) time Acknowledgments Tacknowledse. on bebslf of the entire mathematies community. the unparglleled senius of ruself Reterences . A. "The Complexitv of Theorem-Proving Procedures." STOC '71. ACM. 1971 2. Karp. R. M. "Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems." in Complexity of Computer Valiant, L. G. "The Complexity of Enumeration and Reliability Problems." SIAM J. Comput. vol. 8. no. 3, pp. 410-421. 1979. :contentReference oaicite:2 index=2 4. Papadimitrion. C. H.. et al. *On the Complexity of Local Search in Combinatorial Optimize 6. Arora. S.. Safra. S. Probabilistic Checking of Proofs: A New Characterization of NP"