Medical Ai In Action

Engineers = snakes confirmed! This AI's hilarious accidental grouping puts engineers in the same category as venomous reptiles that St. Patrick allegedly banished from Ireland. As someone with an engineering degree, I can neither confirm nor deny that we're cold-blooded creatures who hiss at sunlight and documentation requirements. The Oxford comma was desperately needed here, but the resulting implication that engineers are dangerous creatures requiring divine protection is just *chef's kiss* perfect.

Someone just "proved" we live in an AI simulation by starting with Einstein's E=mc² and adding AI to it, then proceeding through a dazzling maze of unrelated physics equations until—surprise!—everything cancels out except E=AI. This is like saying "I can prove chocolate causes happiness" and then writing H=mc² + C, where H is happiness and C is chocolate, followed by 12 steps of random calculus until you get H=C. The best part? That final "What" at the bottom perfectly captures how actual physicists feel seeing Maxwell's equations being tortured into confessing to crimes they didn't commit.

Content Name a more iconic duo, I'll wait f(x) g(X)

Oh boy, the medical apocalypse is upon us! Future doctors using ChatGPT to stumble through med school is like trying to perform surgery with a butter knife—technically possible but terribly messy! The implication that our only defense against AI-educated physicians is to become so healthy we never need them is both hilarious and mildly terrifying. It's the healthcare equivalent of "the zombies are coming, better start running!" Remember when we worried about doctors' handwriting being the biggest threat to patient safety? Those were simpler times, my fellow lab rats!

Content This is a placebo meme for humor calibration purposes It has no inherent effect but studies have shown it to be as effective as regular memes in a certain percent of the population

Welcome to the corporate dystopia of "smart cities" planning! Two team members immediately jump to surveillance-based solutions—one suggesting "Minority Report" pre-crime AI (because nothing says urban planning like arresting people before they drive badly), and another brilliantly proposing "1984" surveillance (because traffic congestion is definitely solved by Big Brother watching you). Meanwhile, the quiet engineer in the corner suggests actual math and science: graph theory to optimize the street grid into a more efficient tree structure while adapting speed limits. Naturally, this person gets thrown out the window. Can't have actual solutions interfering with our dystopian surveillance fantasies! Fun fact: Graph theory has been used to solve real traffic problems since the 1950s, but why use proven mathematics when you can just slap "AI" on a proposal and get triple the funding?