First Time? The Technological Extinction Event Hierarchy

The classic "make up a complicated equation and pretend it solves everything" approach! This physicist is trolling economists by creating a nonsensical formula that supposedly revolutionizes global trade economics by—wait for it—just adding "AI" to the end. The equation itself is mathematical gibberish dressed up in fancy symbols, but adding "AI" magically makes it revolutionary. It's basically the academic equivalent of saying "but what if we used blockchain?" to solve any problem. The unfinished sentence at the end is the cherry on top of this magnificent satire of how AI gets thrown into discussions where it doesn't belong.

Physics professors: "Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed." Meanwhile, ChatGPT's servers vaporizing 1000 liters of cooling water into the void dimension every time you ask it to explain why your crush isn't texting back. The First Law of AI Thermodynamics: Conservation of Energy applies to everything except data centers, which convert electricity directly into existential dread and slightly warmer oceans.

Remember when we thought AI would enslave humanity? Turns out it's busy inventing "Applum" and "Bananum" while confidently declaring coconut ends with "um." The gap between sci-fi AI dystopia and reality is basically the difference between Skynet and a toddler with a dictionary. Next time someone warns you about the robot apocalypse, just remember this AI is one "food names that rhyme with spoon" search away from listing "macaroon-um" as its first result.

Nothing humbles human superiority quite like a robot dropping the calculus bomb. The robot asks why humans think animals are inferior, then delivers the knockout punch: "Can they solve integrals and derivatives? Can you?" And just like that, the smug human realizes they've been measuring intelligence with a yardstick they themselves can't live up to. The silence in that last panel contains the sound of millions of forgotten math lessons. Turns out claiming intellectual dominance requires actually remembering what you learned in 12th grade.

The irony is just *chef's kiss*. ChatGPT, the AI that's supposed to be distinguishing itself from humans, can't pass the very test designed to keep bots out. It's looking at a CAPTCHA and confidently declaring what the distorted text says, completely missing that CAPTCHAs exist precisely because AI shouldn't be able to read them. This is like watching a robot fail the Turing test while insisting it passed with flying colors. The digital equivalent of "how do you do, fellow humans?"

The mathematical comedy show starring ChatGPT! First, it confidently declares 9.11 > 9.9 (correct). Then when asked to subtract them, it gives 0.21 (also correct). But when prompted to "use python" suddenly 9.11 - 9.9 = -0.79?! This is the AI equivalent of a student who can solve a problem on paper but completely falls apart during the practical exam. What we're witnessing is floating-point arithmetic having an existential crisis. In computers, decimal numbers are approximated, leading to these bizarre precision errors that would make any math teacher reach for the red pen... and possibly a stiff drink.