Deep Learning! More Like Deep Cleaning!

The meme hilariously mocks how people try to spot AI-generated content by counting em dashes! Einstein's actual 1905 paper on special relativity (which revolutionized physics by showing electricity and magnetism are two sides of the same coin) uses FOUR em dashes in its first paragraph. By modern "AI detection logic," Einstein would be flagged as a bot! The irony is delicious—our primitive AI detection methods would label one of history's greatest geniuses as artificial intelligence. Maybe being mistaken for AI is actually a compliment? *twirls mustache maniacally*

Einstein's equation gets a modern upgrade. Apparently, the secret to winning a Nobel Prize these days is just adding "AI" to any famous formula. Next week: F=ma+blockchain. The Nobel Committee's standards have really evolved since 1921.

Funding agencies suddenly develop interest in theoretical physics once you slap "+AI" onto your equations. The scientific equivalent of sprinkling buzzwords onto your grant application like seasoning on a bland meal. Notice how the funder went from "boring" to "oh!" faster than a particle accelerator. Theoretical physicists have known this trick since the blockchain era - just add whatever technology is currently getting venture capital thrown at it. Next year we'll be solving the Eindinger equation with quantum blockchain NFT metaverse technology.

Ever notice how professors lose their minds when you cite Wikipedia or ChatGPT, but absolutely swoon over Ramanujan's "it came to me in a dream" mathematical proofs? 🌸 The legendary mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan literally claimed the goddess Namagiri whispered equations to him while he slept, and academia was like "Seems legit!" Meanwhile, your meticulously researched Wikipedia citation gets you banished to the shadow realm of academic integrity violations. Double standards much? Next time just tell your professor that ChatGPT is your personal dream deity. Worth a shot!

Even superheroes draw the line somewhere! The scientific community's collective panic attack over letting large language models peer review papers is perfectly captured here. Scientists who've spent decades perfecting their methodologies watching AI casually waltz into their territory? *slaps table* ABSOLUTELY NOT! The sacred peer review process requires years of expertise, crippling imposter syndrome, and at least three existential crises—not some algorithm that learned science by reading Wikipedia. Next thing you know, ChatGPT will be applying for tenure and stealing all the good parking spots!

Looks like someone finally found a practical application for indefinite integrals - predicting the inevitable AI takeover. The constant of integration "C" has evolved into "AI" which is... concerning. Mathematicians have been warning us all along that unknown constants will be our downfall. Next time your calculus professor says "don't forget the constant," they're not just talking about your grade.