The Growing Inaccessibility Of Accessibility Articles

The eternal struggle of every programmer and scientist! On the left, we have the desperate search for documentation—that mythical guide that supposedly explains how everything works. The frantic "WHERE IS IT" captures that 3 AM panic when your code breaks or your experiment fails for no apparent reason. Meanwhile, on the right, there's Bugs Bunny smugly saying "NO" to creating documentation for others, because who has time for that when there are more experiments to run? The cycle of scientific suffering continues as we hypocritically demand documentation while refusing to write it ourselves. Future you will hate present you for this decision, guaranteed.

The eternal struggle of STEM students captured in perfect meme format! On the left, we have the skeletal, barely-alive business major bragging about their 3.87 GPA while their soul has clearly left their body. Meanwhile, the engineering student with their measly 2.6 GPA looks like an absolute chad—fully bearded, well-adjusted, and somehow thriving despite being crushed by differential equations and thermodynamics at 2AM. The engineering curriculum is basically academic hazing with equations. Those partial derivatives and material stress calculations don't care about your sleep schedule or social life. The business major is studying "supply and demand" while engineers are calculating how many tears per hour they can produce before dehydration sets in.

Who needs dating apps when you can just prove non-Euclidean topological theorems? Nothing says "I'm available" like obsessing over whether a hairy sphere can be a topological manifold! This is peak male courtship behavior—spending Friday nights with mathematical proofs instead of people. The irony is delicious—suggesting that the solution to loneliness is diving deeper into abstract math that approximately zero potential partners will understand. The "hair" on the sphere creates a singularity at point q, making it mathematically imperfect, much like the dating strategies of the men this meme is roasting. Mathematical elegance: 10/10. Social awareness: -∞.

The Hollywood version of chemistry vs. actual lab work. Real chemists know most reactions look like slightly cloudy water turning slightly less cloudy over 72 hours. Meanwhile, stock photographers are out here making "chemistry" look like a rave at Hogwarts. No actual experiment produces that perfect dry ice fog or those impossibly vibrant colors unless you're synthesizing Instagram likes. The most exciting part of my PhD was when a solution turned from clear to slightly yellow. I took a picture. My mom still has it on her fridge.

The classic academic grass-is-always-greener paradox perfectly visualized with a bell curve of IQ distribution! Those at both extremes of the intelligence spectrum (the 0.1% geniuses and, uh, the other end) think internships beat studying. Meanwhile, the stressed-out average folks in the middle (the 68% under the bell curve's peak) are convinced university is better while drowning in workplace responsibilities. It's the statistical manifestation of cognitive dissonance - wherever you are, you're convinced the other option is better. The normal distribution isn't just for probability theory anymore; it's tracking our collective inability to be satisfied with our current situation! Fun fact: this psychological phenomenon is related to the "hedonic treadmill" - we quickly adapt to our current circumstances and return to our baseline happiness level, no matter which side of the education-employment divide we're on.

The integral of (2x+1)dx equals x² + x + C, but our forgetful calculus hero left out the +C! The constant of integration is like that one friend who shows up late to the party but is essential for mathematical completeness. Missing the constant of integration is practically a rite of passage in calculus class. Your professor circles it in red pen, your classmates snicker, and somewhere a mathematician sheds a single tear. But hey, at least the derivative of both answers is the same, so you're technically correct... the best kind of correct!