The Crocodile Always Eats The Bigger Number

The Nobel Prize committee just called—they want their physics award back because you've clearly mastered forces beyond mortal comprehension! That Pringles ring is basically the snack food equivalent of the Large Hadron Collider. It's standing there defying gravity through the delicate balance of structural forces, static friction, and precise chip curvature. The sadistic part? One slight tremor or sneeze and your majestic creation collapses faster than a quantum wave function under observation. This is the ultimate office procrastination flex—"Sorry boss, can't finish that report, I'm conducting important research on non-adhesive curved surface stability."

Content V rigght the area of your graph where the cart was moving at a constant velocity on the flat pat of the graph which should have a constant negative slope. This is where the cart was not accelerating. 11 12. 13. 14. Use the cursor, tap and release where it begins, then drag to where the run ends and again tap and re You should now have the area highlighted where the cart was moving at a constant velocity. Press menu > 2: Data - 5: Strike Data - 2: Outside Selected Region verify that vou have selected the portion of vour eraph that shows the can mo vita a consrant veocin° n should be a line rising from left to right. If vou need to reselect do that now 15. 16. Press menu -> 4: Analyze -> 6: Curve Fit -> 1: Linear in the window that pops up record the slope (m) value into Table 2, this is the measured velocity. Ignore the slopes negative sign. The sensor measures obiects moving toward it as going in a negative direction. 17. Repeat steps the previous steps for vour other trials 18. Table 2 save your work on the calculator; press doc › 1: File -> 4: Save Run Height Measured v (m/S) 19. Submit your work; press doc -> 1: File -> 6: Send (m) Observations 0.100 20. Did the cart's velocity decrease when it was released from the lower 1.88 marks? It so, why do you think this may have happened? 2 0.075 ,953 21. acce era Use your measured (Table 2) and theoretical (Table 1) values to compute the percent % difference measured. theoretical k 100 ditterence for each run rhonrorical 0.050 4 0.025 .830 .603 Run 2 з 4 Height Measured v (m) (m/s) Table 3 Theoretical v (m/s) Percent Difference 0.100 1.188 ,245 984% 0.075 953 1.187 412% 0.050 830.125 5649 0.025 603.066 99581 Calculations: table 1 22. Were you successful in predicting the velocity of the car at the bottom of the ramp? NO. Absslutely Use the mass of the cart and g = 9.8 m/s? to theoretical gravitational potential enerov (C the 10 cm (0.10 m) height. Use the measur cart for the 10 cm heicht (Run #1\ to calcu energy (KE) of the cart. Record this inforn Calculations: 25. How does the gravitationa potential er 26. Based on vour results. did all of the in 27. If there is a difterence between the caused the ditterence: Synthesize 28. What was the independent varia 29. What did you measure? 30. what was the result when vou Error Analysis 31 What were the sources of err Conclusions 32. Did the initial height of the 33. Do your results support yc Case v2 Case

The expectation vs. reality gap in academia is truly magnificent. In our heads, math professors are distinguished gentlemen with tweed jackets and thoughtful expressions who probably solve equations while sipping Earl Grey. Meanwhile, the genuine article is teaching Maxwell's equations in Batman boxers and tattoos. The best part? Those equations on the board are actually legitimate electromagnetism formulas. Nothing says "I understand the fundamental forces of the universe" quite like explaining vector calculus while your nipples catch a draft. Education has never been so... breezy.

This meme brilliantly contrasts the romanticized 19th-century element discovery (just find a weird rock in Sweden!) with modern particle physics reality. Today's scientists need billion-dollar particle accelerators to smash gold atoms together at near-light speed, only to detect decay products of elements so unstable they exist for nanoseconds. Then comes the academic cage match where physicists fight over naming rights for something nobody will ever hold in their hand. Swedish miners had it so easy—they just needed a pickaxe and good luck to become immortalized in the periodic table!

The eternal battle between theoretical perfection and practical chaos! Mathematicians are sweating bullets over proper calculus rules while physicists are just vibing with their approximations. In math world, canceling derivatives is blasphemy—like putting pineapple on pizza. Meanwhile, physicists are gleefully simplifying equations with that "close enough" energy. The dB/dt equation? Just cross out what doesn't work and move on! This is why engineers build bridges with a 4x safety factor. They know a physicist was involved somewhere in the calculations!

The eternal scientific rivalry of Britain vs France! Pick your scientific dream team! On the left, Team UK with Newton's gravity gang featuring Hooke's springs, Faraday's electromagnetic wizardry, Maxwell's equations, and Dirac's quantum magic. On the right, Team France with Lagrange's mechanics squad, Laplace's probability posse, Ampère's current crew, Curie's radioactive revolutionaries, and de Broglie's wave-particle weirdness! It's basically the Eurovision Song Contest but for people who changed our understanding of the universe! Both teams discovered fundamental laws that make your smartphone work, your GPS accurate, and your microwave heat up last night's pizza. Choose wisely - your scientific allegiance defines you!