Scientific-laws Memes

Posts tagged with Scientific-laws

Gravity Of The Situation

Gravity Of The Situation
Someone's having an existential crisis about planetary motion! This chat shows a person dramatically questioning why Kepler's laws should apply to them, only to be met with the perfect punchline: "Would you say that Newton's laws are holding you down?" Pure physics comedy gold right there! For the curious minds: Kepler's laws describe how planets orbit in elliptical paths around the sun, while Newton's law of universal gravitation explains why we're stuck to Earth instead of floating away. The rebellion against these fundamental forces of nature is... not going to end well for our frustrated friend.

Three Laws To Rule Them All

Three Laws To Rule Them All
Economics desperately throws 99 laws at reality and still misses most of it. Meanwhile, physics just casually drops Newton's three laws and explains nearly everything. Efficiency at its finest. The universe really said "keep it simple" and economists took that personally.

Newton 🤝 Coulomb: Inverse Square Soulmates

Newton 🤝 Coulomb: Inverse Square Soulmates
Two scientific giants, one mathematical structure. Newton's law of gravitation and Coulomb's law of electrostatic force are practically identical twins separated at birth. Both follow the inverse square relationship where force decreases with the square of distance. The only difference? Masses versus charges. It's like they both independently discovered the universe's favorite copy-paste template. Nature really said "why create new math when the old one works perfectly fine?"

The Scientific Method Spectrum

The Scientific Method Spectrum
Look at these scientific mindsets in their natural habitat! Mathematicians live in a pristine world where theorems, once proven, are eternal cosmic truths. Physicists? They're the eternal optimists with commitment issues—their "laws" work perfectly until some pesky experiment ruins everything! Chemists are the chaotic neutral scientists with rules so specific they might as well include "only when Mercury is in retrograde and you're wearing mismatched socks." And then there's biology, where nothing makes sense except through the lens of probability because living things refuse to follow instructions! The more complex the science gets, the more it resembles trying to herd cats while blindfolded!

Mathematician Vs Physicist

Mathematician Vs Physicist
The eternal disciplinary divide captured in canine form. Mathematicians strut around with their bulletproof theorems that work in all possible universes, dimensions, and realities. Meanwhile, physicists are just vibing with "good enough" laws until some grad student finds the exception that ruins everything. Newton thought he had gravity figured out until Einstein showed up with a cosmic "well, actually..." Four centuries of smugness - gone.

The Infinite Digits Of Confidence

The Infinite Digits Of Confidence
The mathematical burn is strong with this one! The poster hilariously misunderstands both π and thermodynamics in one spectacular swoop. π is an irrational number with infinite non-repeating digits, so there's literally no such thing as the "last ten digits." Meanwhile, there are only three laws of thermodynamics (four if you count the zeroth law). The joke accidentally proves itself by demonstrating exactly what happens when someone confidently speaks about science they don't understand. It's like trying to find the end of a circle—you'll be running forever!

Math Vs. Physics: The Proof Is In The Pudding

Math Vs. Physics: The Proof Is In The Pudding
The mathematical purists spend decades proving theorems with rigorous formality, while physicists are over here like "yeah, this equation predicted a black hole and we found it, so... law." Nothing captures the disciplinary divide quite like our standards of proof. Mathematicians require absolute certainty; physicists just need something that doesn't explode the lab or contradict last week's experiment. The pragmatism is almost offensive to pure mathematicians, but hey—both approaches gave us smartphones, so who's complaining?

Equilibrium Right?

Equilibrium Right?
Two scientific principles staring each other down like they're about to throw hands in the academic thunderdome. Newton's 3rd Law says "for every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction," while Le Chatelier's Principle insists "systems will adjust to minimize change." So basically, one says "push back" and the other says "chill out." The eternal standoff between physics and chemistry students during finals week. Neither will back down, both technically correct in their own domains. Scientific stalemate at its finest.

Physicists Vs. Chemists: The Universal Truth

Physicists Vs. Chemists: The Universal Truth
The eternal rivalry between physicists and chemists captured in perfect doge form! Physicists strut around with their buff "no exceptions" universal laws like Newton's gravity or thermodynamics, confidently declaring they've figured out how everything works. Meanwhile, chemists are sitting there with their periodic table like "yeah but actually these two elements are weird and don't follow the pattern and here are 116 exceptions because reality is messy." The deliberately misspelled "lawm" and "excepmt" perfectly capture the chaotic energy of chemistry compared to physics' rigid structure. Every student who's had to memorize orbital exceptions knows this pain!

The Mathematician's Revenge: Physics Edition

The Mathematician's Revenge: Physics Edition
The textbook author basically said "Physics: it's kinda right, I guess, if you squint hard enough." Meanwhile, math is over there being all "I am the eternal truth!" 🙄 That highlighted part is the academic equivalent of saying "Physics laws work... until they don't." Thanks for the vote of confidence! Next they'll tell us gravity is just a suggestion that objects follow when they're in the mood. The mathematician who wrote this textbook definitely got a C- in physics and never forgave their professor.

No It Doesn't Affect My Baby: Electromagnetism Edition

No It Doesn't Affect My Baby: Electromagnetism Edition
The top panel shows a pregnant woman with wine and cigarettes claiming "No it doesn't affect my baby." Fast forward to the bottom panel, and her child has grown into a physics prodigy who believes ∇·B ≠ 0 — directly violating Maxwell's equations which state that magnetic monopoles don't exist (∇·B = 0). This kid is basically claiming magnetic monopoles are real! That's like a physicist's version of believing the Earth is flat. The poor child's understanding of electromagnetism got permanently scrambled in utero. Next thing you know, they'll be trying to build a perpetual motion machine powered by their "revolutionary" magnetic theory!

Why I Like Physics More Than Chemistry

Why I Like Physics More Than Chemistry
The eternal battle between physics and chemistry laid bare! On the left, we have the muscular "Physicist Doge" confidently proclaiming the universality of physical laws—clean, elegant, and absolute. Meanwhile, the sad little "Chemist Doge" struggles with a field where only two elements follow the rules while the other 116 are just doing whatever they want. This is basically why physicists strut around campus with their elegant equations while chemists are in the lab wearing hazmat suits and muttering "well, it should work this time." Physics gives you the universe in a neat package; chemistry gives you exceptions, explosions, and existential crises.