Internet Memes

When mathematical literacy goes to die on internet forums. The first poster claims 14 is prime, which would require it to be divisible only by 1 and itself. The second poster correctly points out that 14 is divisible by 2 and 7, making it decidedly non-prime. It's like watching someone confidently announce they've discovered a new element called "water" only to be reminded that H₂O has been on the periodic table since... never. This is the mathematical equivalent of bringing a knife to a gun fight, except the knife is made of Play-Doh.

The punchline is the mathematical bamboozle! What looks like a complex function f(x,y) turns out to be just multiplication. The first three equations show 1×4=5 , 2×5=12 , and 3×6=21 - which are all wrong! The character's smug expression perfectly captures that moment when you realize these viral math puzzles are deliberately designed with incorrect operations to spark internet arguments. The answer to f(8,11) should be 88 if following the multiplication pattern, but honestly, who cares? It's a trap designed to make people fight in comment sections while engagement metrics soar. Next time you see one of these, just remember: the real function is generating ad revenue.

The classic logical fallacy of confusing "sufficient" with "necessary" conditions strikes again! Our green friend here thinks they've cracked extraterrestrial existence through Rule 34 logic: "If aliens exist, there's porn of them" → "There's porn of aliens" → "Therefore aliens exist." Unfortunately, that's like saying "If it rains, the ground gets wet" → "The ground is wet" → "Therefore it rained." Someone skipped their intro to logic class while searching for... unconventional evidence. The truth is out there, but probably not in those search results.

The mathematical existential crisis is real! This is the numerical equivalent of naming your pet rock—technically, you can do it. In mathematics, we can indeed assign any name to any number (hello, Graham's Number and Googolplex), but "morbillion" exists in that delightful limbo between made-up internet nonsense and legitimate mathematical nomenclature. Since our number system is infinitely extensible, the fictional "morbillion" could theoretically be defined anywhere we want. It's like reserving a username that nobody was competing for but still feeling smug about getting it first. The real mind-blow is realizing our number naming conventions are just as arbitrary as deciding whether a hotdog is a sandwich.