The Two Types Of Scientists

The mathematical hipster wars are raging! Top panel shows a Greek mathematician losing his mind over discovering irrational numbers with a 45-45-90 triangle (where the hypotenuse equals √2). Meanwhile, the Babylonians below are like "Bro, we knew about irrational numbers THREE THOUSAND YEARS earlier!" It's the ancient math equivalent of "I liked that band before they were cool." The Babylonians had already figured out that some numbers (like √2) can't be expressed as simple fractions, but the Greeks get all the textbook glory for "discovering" it. Classic academic colonization at work - next thing you know, the Greeks will claim they invented breathing!

The truth they don't want you to know! Big Math has been manipulating us with π (3.14159...) all along. They created a whole holiday on March 14th just to sell more calculators and geometry textbooks. Next thing you know, they'll claim the Pythagorean theorem was an inside job and that parallel lines actually DO meet (but only when no one's looking). The whiteboard formulas in the background are clearly part of the indoctrination process. Stay woke, calculate responsibly!

Nothing tests your philosophical convictions quite like staring down x 2 in algebra class. Suddenly that staunch atheist who gave a 45-minute lecture on the non-existence of divine beings is frantically calculating 2 3 and mumbling about "raising to a higher power." The mathematical universe has a twisted sense of humor—forcing you to acknowledge powers whether you believe in them or not. Even Richard Dawkins probably gets sweaty palms when facing exponential functions.

The perfect textbook example of why statisticians drink heavily. Someone asks about the probability of a plane getting struck by lightning while crossing a rainbow (an actually fascinating statistical question), and the galaxy-brain response? "50% - it either happens or it doesn't." This is the mathematical equivalent of saying water is wet because it's not dry. Every statistics professor just felt a disturbance in the force, as if millions of carefully crafted probability distributions suddenly cried out in terror and were silenced. The irony of this appearing on a Probability & Statistics textbook cover is *chef's kiss* perfection. Next up in Statistical Fallacies 101: "What are the odds of winning the lottery? 50% - I either win or I don't!"

Content MATH MATORS TRYINGTORESIST TETINGTHEIR TITLECOUSTI THAT THEY DON'T HAVE A FRIEND "GROUF" 4-34 € BUT RATHER A FRIEND SET DUE TO THE SET CONTAINING ATI OF THEIR FRIENDS NOT BEIG DEFINED AS A PROPER ALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE imgflip.com

The third "war crime" is the square root of negative three divided by zero. For mathematicians, this is truly criminal—attempting to take the square root of a negative number (which gives you an imaginary number) and then dividing by zero (which is undefined). It's like breaking two fundamental mathematical laws simultaneously. The kind of thing that would make your calculus professor wake up in a cold sweat. I've seen graduate students develop eye twitches when encountering expressions like this on exams.