The Quantum Superposition Of Math Content

This is a classic case of someone trying to apply mathematical set theory to social concepts without understanding how logical implications actually work! The notation in the title (A ⊇ B ⇒ A ⊆ B) is mathematically incorrect - if A contains B (superset), it doesn't imply that A is contained in B (subset). That's like saying "if all squares are rectangles, then all rectangles are squares" - which is demonstrably false! The tweet confuses subset relationships with categorical statements. In set theory, "trans women are women" would be expressed as "trans women ⊆ women" (trans women are a subset of women), but that doesn't logically imply the reverse statement "women ⊆ trans women" (all women are trans women). The person clearly slept through their discrete mathematics class and now thinks they've made some profound logical discovery. Next time, bring coffee to those 8 AM math lectures!

The ultimate historical name-calling mix-up! One person's pointing at portraits of Robert Hooke (left) and Gottfried Leibniz (right) shouting "Newton!" while the actual scientists are like "Hey guys, not what we're called." 😂 This is peak scientific rivalry comedy! Newton, Hooke, and Leibniz had LEGENDARY feuds over who discovered calculus first and other scientific achievements. Newton and Hooke battled over optics and gravity, while Newton and Leibniz had the mother of all math fights over calculus. Imagine being so brilliant but still getting mistaken for your arch-nemesis! The scientific equivalent of calling your teacher "Mom" but WAY more devastating!

When your physics professor tries to calculate the total angular momentum of all the times your mom has spun around in quantum space! The equation looks legit with all those vector arrows, but we all know it's just a sophisticated dad joke disguised as quantum mechanics. The magnitude of |S⃗| is directly proportional to how fast you'll run out of the lecture hall from second-hand embarrassment.

The irony is just *chef's kiss* perfect! A cashier is ringing up two "Math for Dummies" books at $16.99 each but tells the customer the total is $50. The mathematical error proves exactly why someone might need those books in the first place! It's like watching natural selection happen in real-time but with arithmetic. The universe has a wicked sense of humor sometimes - charging extra for knowledge you clearly already need. Perhaps the cashier should get an employee discount on those books...

The classic frog-lily pad-rock scenario strikes again! If you've ever taken a probability course, these three images haunt your dreams. Markov chains describe systems where the next state depends only on the current state (not the past), and textbook authors are OBSESSED with using frogs hopping between lily pads and rocks to explain it. It's like textbook authors had exactly ONE meeting about how to explain probability transitions and unanimously decided: "Green frog. Green pads. Some rocks. DONE." The probability of escaping this example? Approximately zero!

Behold the most fruitful trigonometric identity ever discovered! The ratio of sin(gerine) to cos(gerine) equals tangerine—it's mathematically delicious! This is what happens when math professors go grocery shopping while thinking about calculus. The beauty of this pun lies in the fundamental trigonometric relationship where sine divided by cosine equals tangent. Whoever crafted this masterpiece deserves a Fields Medal in mathematical comedy. Next time you're struggling with trig identities, just remember: citrus fruits make everything clearer!