The eternal battle in paleontology illustrated perfectly! On the left, we have the scientifically accurate dinosaur reconstruction - drab colors, anatomically correct, and about as exciting as watching fossils form. Meanwhile, the flamboyant "Chad" version on the right is basically a dinosaur that raided a rave's wardrobe department.
What's hilarious is this actually reflects a real tension in paleontology. Scientists have minimal evidence of soft tissue and coloration, so technically both could be correct! The "virgin" reconstruction plays it safe with evidence, while the "chad" version says "what if dinosaurs were fabulous party animals?"
The irony? Many modern birds (dinosaur descendants) ARE ridiculously colorful. So maybe those neon feathers aren't so speculative after all. Nature's greatest flex might just be turning terrifying predators into rainbow-colored show-offs!
Academia
Ai
Astronomy
Biology
Chemistry
Climate
Conspiracy
Earth-science
Engineering
Evolution
Geology