Should Be A Plus Point Right?

Engineering students know the pain! When your textbooks are so expensive and thick that they become structural support for your electronics. That chemical engineering textbook alone probably cost half a semester's food budget. The face says it all: "I didn't spend $300 on 'Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering' to turn it into furniture, but here we are." College bookstores should just rebrand as "Overpriced Building Materials Inc."

Education: "Plagiarism is unacceptable!" Software engineers: "I found this on Stack Overflow, therefore it belongs to everyone." The entire tech industry runs on a delicate balance of copied code and strategic amnesia. Remember that fancy algorithm you're so proud of? Your colleague grabbed it from GitHub while you were getting coffee. The only original code left in existence is the buggy stuff nobody wants to steal.

Chemistry Reddit just got invaded by the polymer people! What we're seeing is someone casually pouring 50 LITERS of a viscous polymer solution while asking for "improvement ideas" like they're sharing a cookie recipe. The bottom panel shows the classic "Sir, a second plane has hit" meme format, but with "SIR, A SECOND CUM LUBE SYNTH HAS HIT /R/CHEMISTRY" - implying the subreddit is being hilariously overrun by these bizarre industrial-scale personal lubricant formulations. The chemistry community is simultaneously horrified and fascinated by this polymer chemist gone rogue. It's basically what happens when someone discovers they can use their lab skills for... extracurricular activities. 💦🧪

The eternal physics vs. engineering divide in one image. Physicists insist on technical correctness about electron flow (negative to positive), while engineers just want their circuits to work. It's like arguing about which direction water flows while your house is flooding. The conventional current (positive to negative) works perfectly fine for calculations—much like how we all agree to pretend that meetings will end "on time." Both get the job done, just with different levels of existential despair.

The corporate world thinks engineers and experimental physicists are fundamentally different creatures, but then there's the theoretical physicist just staring back like "seriously?" The joke's in the punchline – to a theoretical physicist, engineers and experimental physicists might as well be identical twins! Both spend their days tinkering with equipment, getting their hands dirty, and occasionally making things explode. Meanwhile, theoretical physicists are off in mathematical dreamland, deriving equations and contemplating the universe without touching a single piece of lab equipment. The academic caste system strikes again!

The eternal struggle of engineering students captured in one image. Imperial units have students calmly solving a straightforward problem, while metric calculations drive them to existential despair and acrobatics. What's truly hilarious is that metric is objectively simpler—it's just that American education has conditioned students to fear SI units like they're some kind of dark magic. The contrast between the composed imperial solvers and the metric users hanging themselves with unit conversion anxiety is painfully relatable to anyone who's had to switch between systems mid-exam. The real punchline? Most scientific fields exclusively use metric, so these imperial-loving students are just postponing their inevitable breakdown. Nothing says "welcome to engineering" like sobbing over Pascal conversions at 3 AM.