No He Never Said That 😭

Mathematicians spent centuries calculating π to billions of digits, and this person just asked ChatGPT for the last 8! 😂 The ultimate mathematical shortcut! Remember when finding π meant memorizing 3.14159 or doing actual calculations? Now we're just outsourcing our mathematical heavy lifting to AI. Next up: "Hey ChatGPT, solve the Riemann Hypothesis while I grab coffee." Mathematical proofs in 2023: Step 1 - Ask AI. Step 2 - There is no step 2.

The eternal mathematician's gambit: "I checked it for n=1,2,3,4... therefore it must be true for all n!" Meanwhile, Grok 3 is over here solving Putnam problems that stumped 500 human math prodigies. This is the perfect illustration of the induction principle gone wrong—the mathematical equivalent of saying "I survived jumping off a 1-foot ledge, so clearly I'll survive jumping off a cliff." The irony of the title paired with an AI solving a complex Hankel matrix determinant problem is just *chef's kiss*. The gap between "I think this pattern works" and actually proving it rigorously is where mathematicians either become legends or end up writing that infamous line on their exams.

The existential crisis of AI developers is truly a sight to behold! While everyone else is busy doomscrolling through articles about AI taking jobs and destroying humanity, the actual developers are sitting there wondering why they're creating these digital overlords in the first place. It's like building a guillotine while simultaneously questioning if beheading is really the way to go. The irony is delicious - they're building the very thing everyone fears, yet they themselves seem the most terrified! Perhaps Skynet's greatest weakness isn't some clever hack, but rather the collective imposter syndrome of its creators.

LinkedIn has officially reached the event horizon of corporate pseudointellectualism. Someone just casually violated the conservation of energy by adding "AI" to Einstein's equation like it's a bonus topping at Subway. The MIT physicist's single-word response "What" perfectly encapsulates the collective groan of the scientific community. Next up: F = ma + blockchain, where the blockchain makes objects accelerate through the power of decentralized consensus.

Expectation: Serene forest bike ride with clean HUD displaying your vitals and performance metrics. Reality: Same forest view but 70% obscured by unskippable ads for Dune Part Two, vitamins, and home security cameras. Just imagine trying to enjoy nature while your visual cortex is bombarded with "BUY NOW" prompts that you can't even close with an imaginary finger. The true innovation of brain-computer interfaces will apparently be finding new neural pathways to ignore advertisements.

Content I CAN DRAG THIS POINT IN THE Y DIRÈCTION THAT MEANS IT'S UNCONSTRAINED SO I SHOULD PUT A CONSTRAINT ON IT SO PÜT A CONSTRÄINT ON IT IN THE Y DIRECTION YUP YEAH MAKES SENSE TO ME SKETCH IS OVERCONSTRAINED