The Great Scientific Workplace Deception

Mathematicians don't want to meet their descendants—they'd rather time travel to roast ancient Greek mathematicians who were this close to inventing calculus! Eudoxus's Method of Exhaustion (calculating areas by using progressively smaller shapes) was basically proto-calculus 2000 years before Newton and Leibniz. Modern mathematician is basically telling him "dude, you were RIGHT THERE, just needed to think about rates of change too!" The mathematical equivalent of watching someone solve 95% of a puzzle then walk away. Pure mathematician energy—more excited about theoretical breakthroughs than meeting actual humans from the future.

Oh look, it's Einstein's famous equation getting a modern upgrade! First we have the classic E = mc², which revolutionized physics by establishing mass-energy equivalence. But wait—someone's pointing out the glaring omission! In 2023, no equation is complete without slapping "AI" onto it. Because obviously, the most groundbreaking scientific discovery of our time needs a buzzword to stay relevant in grant applications. Next week: E = mc² + AI + blockchain + quantum computing. That's how you secure funding these days, kids.

That crushing moment when Wolfram Alpha—the mathematical superhero we all depend on—delivers the devastating news: "It has no analytical solutions." 😭 Every math student knows this pain! You've spent hours trying to solve an equation by hand, finally surrender to technology hoping for salvation, and BAM—even the computational gods can't help you. It's like asking your smartest friend for homework help and they just shrug dramatically. This is basically the mathematical equivalent of being told "it's not you, it's the fundamental limitations of algebraic expression." Pure heartbreak in computational form!

The infamous "assume a frictionless surface" strikes again! Physics textbooks love creating these bizarrely simplified scenarios where basic laws of nature just... don't apply. Sure, let's ignore air resistance, friction, and apparently gravity's selective application while we're at it. The person in the cart gets normal physics, but the poor soul hanging below? Nope, they're just dangling in theoretical physics purgatory. This is exactly why students think physics is disconnected from reality. Next problem: "Calculate the velocity of this wagon assuming the pool is filled with inviscid fluid and the child is a perfect sphere."

The internet's physics hierarchy perfectly captured! While specialized fields like soft matter and geophysics sit in an empty room, the "Fundamental Physics" door is absolutely swarmed with enthusiasts. Everyone wants to debate quantum mechanics and relativity, but mention statistical physics and watch the crowd disappear faster than a virtual particle. It's like the difference between saying "I understand string theory" at a party versus "I study the rheological properties of non-Newtonian fluids" – one gets you conversations, the other gets you alone with the cheese platter.

Engineering students living in their own dimension where casual conversation is replaced by Navier-Stokes equations. The meme brilliantly captures that moment when someone asks a fluid dynamics enthusiast "how's it going?" and their brain immediately floods with partial differential equations instead of normal human responses. The Navier-Stokes equations shown are the holy grail of fluid dynamics - describing how the velocity, pressure, density and viscosity of a moving fluid are related. They're notoriously complex (one of the Millennium Prize Problems offers $1 million for solving them!), yet to engineering students, they're just casual chitchat material. That final "yea" panel is engineering humor at its finest - as if these incomprehensible equations are just a normal way to respond to "how's it going?" The title "Who Up Stoking They Navier Rn?" perfectly parodies late-night social media posts with "who up?" but for people who stay up late solving fluid dynamics problems instead.