Someone skipped math class to invent economic policy! This brilliant "poverty solution" suggests using the infamous divergent series 1+2+3+... to magically distribute wealth. Unfortunately, this infinite sum doesn't equal -1/12 in standard arithmetic—that's a complex mathematical trick used in string theory and quantum field theory with regularization methods. Even if this mathematical wizardry worked (spoiler: it doesn't), the proposed distribution system would create the world's most inefficient payment processing nightmare. Imagine the paperwork! "Sorry, we can't end poverty today because we're still calculating who gets $7,453,291,221." The real mathematical tragedy? Thinking wealth distribution is as simple as a series that literally breaks mathematics. Next up: solving climate change by dividing by zero!

The eternal struggle of dating a mathematician. One minute they're lovingly knitting you a sweater, the next they're having an existential crisis over a limit problem with binomial coefficients and alternating series. That problem #11 is the mathematical equivalent of meeting your partner's parents for the first time — terrifying, unnecessarily complicated, and somehow you're supposed to find the limit as a approaches infinity when you can barely approach social situations with confidence. The real limit we should be calculating is how many relationships survive differential equations.