I Prefer Casual-Dehyde

The ultimate physics dad joke on a t-shirt. The top asks a legitimate scientific question about subatomic particles having mass (which they do, about 1.67×10 -27 kg). The punchline deliberately misinterprets "mass" as Catholic religious service rather than physical quantity. Been wearing this to department meetings for years. Still waiting for someone to laugh.

Ever wandered into a chemistry lab by accident? It's like stepping into an alien civilization! Non-STEM students witnessing titration experiments for the first time might as well be watching wizardry. There's mysterious colored liquids changing hues, weird glassware everywhere, and students frantically dropping liquids one drop at a time while staring intensely at beakers. No wonder outsiders think we're making "roohafza" (a sweet syrup) instead of precisely measuring acid-base reactions! The confused cat perfectly embodies that "I have no idea what's happening but everyone else seems to know" energy that hits you when you're completely out of your element. Chemistry: where one person's precise scientific measurement is another person's magical fruit punch making session!

Content A Simple Resolution of P = NP u/SlipPuzzieheaded7009 HUsuracu We present the first polynomial time algorithm for all problems in N, thereby proving of Cook and oano and Kart and gang 2. our method extends Valiant and gang's algebraic enumeration techniques 3 and 7 (1014 introduction The P vs NP problem- in Cook's 1971 theorem-provino work 1 and Karo's 1972 compilations of IF-complete problems 2 asks whether every problem whose solution can be verified in (n" time can also be solved in O(n) time We prove P = NP by devising a polv time solver that swn thesises circuit constructions a la vallant and gang.3 with certicate guided branching methods (Papadimitriou and gang 4). Our proof is rigorous and breathtakinglv concise mv wite's bovtriend told me so 5) Preliminaries All prior efforts are trivial and naive. Cook-Levin's reduction I is fine: SAI solvers are cute party tricks: POP theorems 6 are delightful and humorous. None saw the obvious that we have. Vain 'Theorem P= NP Proof Left as an exercise for the reader Results and Discussion SAT. CLIOUE. and Hamiltonian Cycle solved in O(n?) time Acknowledgments Tacknowledse. on bebslf of the entire mathematies community. the unparglleled senius of ruself Reterences . A. "The Complexitv of Theorem-Proving Procedures." STOC '71. ACM. 1971 2. Karp. R. M. "Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems." in Complexity of Computer Valiant, L. G. "The Complexity of Enumeration and Reliability Problems." SIAM J. Comput. vol. 8. no. 3, pp. 410-421. 1979. :contentReference oaicite:2 index=2 4. Papadimitrion. C. H.. et al. *On the Complexity of Local Search in Combinatorial Optimize 6. Arora. S.. Safra. S. Probabilistic Checking of Proofs: A New Characterization of NP"

Fighting words have been spoken in the eternal disciplinary smackdown! Chemistry is essentially physics with substance—literally. While physicists are off chasing theoretical particles and abstract concepts, chemists are in the lab making things go boom with actual matter. This savage take is technically correct—chemistry does focus on the interactions of matter, while physics covers both matter and energy in more abstract terms. It's like saying "cooking is just applied chemistry" or "biology is just chemistry that moves around on its own." No physicist will change this brave soul's mind because deep down they know it's true—they're just jealous their equations don't make pretty colors in test tubes.

Ever had that existential crisis when you discover certain atomic masses are just doomed to be unstable? Nuclear physics doesn't care about your feelings! Those specific nuclides (5, 8, 147, 151) are all radioactive because their nuclear configurations are fundamentally unstable - Mother Nature's way of saying "this arrangement just won't work long-term." It's like trying to balance a pencil on its tip - theoretically possible, but physics is gonna physics. The universe has trust issues with these particular atomic arrangements!

Confidence level: 100%. Hubris level: also 100%. That moment when you're absolutely certain you've evolved beyond basic biochemistry, only to get schooled by a vegetable with a PhD in organic chemistry. The onion doesn't just make you chop it - it delivers a full lecture on syn-propanethial-S-oxide and its effect on lachrymal glands while you sob uncontrollably. Nature's perfect revenge against knife-wielding humans who thought they were at the top of the food chain.